Zimbra Forums

Unless I have not understood how Synacor pushes its code to GitHub, you cannot build up to date builds the day they announce their own. You have a wait a few days (3? 5? maybe a week?) before they push to the public repositories anything related to security fixes in their own code (XSS, etc). Right...

Thank you very much for this test! I had not actually tested upgrading from a version that had already the custom --build-release-candidate setting set to another one with also --build-release-candidate set. Vincent did some amazing discovery here to solve and verify the naming problem in a univers...

Hello, Maldua's Zimbra 10.0.8 and 9.0.0.p40 FOSS Builds have just been released. Please share your experience when upgrading or installing from scratch. Versions : 9.0.0.p40 10.0.8 Platforms : RHEL7 (Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7, Oracle Linux 7, CentOS 7) RHEL8 (Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8, Oracle Linu...

BUILD_NUMBER can be set - but has to be an integer. Hence the thought to use a 7-digit build number. 3-digit FOSS builder number (102 for me below) followed by a sequential 4-digit incrementing build number. Zimbra normally just uses the 4-digit incrementing build number. Can you create a new threa...

So, PATCH_LEVEL must be left at GA. Adding anything further will sometimes break web client connectivity to the server, and will almost always break subsequent upgrades. I agree. --build-release-candidate should be either set to GA or BETA and that's about it. BUILD_NUMBER can be set - but has to b...

So, I tried a two step upgrade Upgrade from latest 8.8.15_P45 to 10.0.5_GAT100005C100005ITS Upgrade from 10.0.5_GAT100005C100005ITS to 10.0.6_GAT100006C100006ITS and it looks like there is an issue with having anything after the _GA For the initial upgrade, all appears to have gone well. ..... Stop...

I was adding your changes when I noticed we have a patch version 8 incoming for release 10.0. That opens up the question of when do we build for FOSS? I would say we only make FOSS builds after the new patches have been published by Synacor for NETWORK - any earlier and we have a higher risk of get...

Notes : This might not be ever released as Zimbra 10.1.0 but rather as Zimbra 11. The current tag naming scheme has been used in the past by Zimbra in order to avoid speculations about future releases. E.g. Some of the 10 features first appeared as 9.1 in the git repos. You should not see issues li...

The Zimbra engineering team continues to monitor these forums [ when not blocked by 502s... still working on that :( ] and should be able to provide insights / hints on how to overcome any issues with the build. This is really appreciated. I have noticed an actual difference from what used to happe...

You are correct that the build numbers starting with Zimbra 10 should be more sane. Starting (resuming?) with Zimbra 10, the product is adhering to proper semantic versioning. The version number is broken into 3 parts: part 1 is the major version, part 2 is the minor version, part 3 is the patch (....