Zimbra Forums

Currently we have zimbra NE installed and would like to roll out a IM client that attaches to the xmpp server zimbra provides. Our users are all using AD authentication within the domain and use there AD un/pw to log into their zimbra accounts. I was wondering if there is a IM client that will pass ...

I am interested in doing this as well due to customer complaints. ]Did anyone find anything in bugzilla?

I also have voted for this feature. Has anyone been able to use the wiki for a workaround. I would rather not have to create two separate domains. The current solution only provides domain wide from what I have read. Their has to be a work around this problem.

I think i am just going to do a new install of x32 on a new server and install latest and then copy the whole zimbra directory from my old server to my new one. Anything I need to watch out for when doing this kind of move?

I am having this problem with 4.5.0 and 4.5.2. Also had it with 4.0 and 4.1 I will post if it is still happening with 4.5.3.

I am on Network Edition. The Cert thing is kind of a pain in the rear. Is their any performance improvement by going to x64?

I have a current zimbra install on RHEL (centos) 32bit and we needed to upgrade the server's hard disk system and I was wondering if its possible to move to x64 version from the x32 version. Can I do a hotbackup on x32 and a restore on x64? I have no problem using the same server name on both. The o...

Ok so we have been using zimbra for almost a year now with AD authentication taking place to multiple domains. The other day I set up a squid server to authenticate to our AD server via ntlm and kerberos. Both firefox and IE would pass username and password to the server without user intervention. R...

Hmm this is still not working quite right for me. LOG.. +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Asterisk debug mode on Calling from 204 to 18xxxxxxxx createSipStack gov.nist.javax.sip.SipStackImpl@44b7f7 Binding to 10.10.0.44:37483 REQUEST INVITE sip:18xxxxxxxxx@astIP:5060 SIP/2.0 Call-ID: 6295dfccd07674a33fc...

I agree, Vote placed.

My expectation is:

- clicking the A button would show ONLY contacts beginning with A

- clicking the B button would show ONLY contacts beginning with B

- clicking the C button would show ONLY contacts beginning with C

and so on.