Zimbra Forums

Probably start by fixing the logging...

Ref: https://wiki.zimbra.com/wiki/Log_Files# ... inating_IP

Hint: zimbraMailTrustedIP

Could be a few things... try adding this after your #!/bin/bash This will setup the environment and is how many other zimbra cron job scripts do it. You can also look in the cron logs for the exact error message.

Jim

Zimbra Customer Feedback About Zimbra 9’s Open Source Status John W. said he received a letter from a customer expressing their dissatisfaction about the recently announced change in Zimbra’s open source policy, starting with Zimbra 9. John shared the customer’s letter with those on the call. The l...

A couple of ways with increasing escalation. Given that ob163.net appears to be running older zimbra server software, you could send email directly in hopes that the admin of that mail server is still reading their email. Old Zimbra versions should/would have been compromised by now if they didn't p...

An additional data point. Just noticed they are upgrading certified wiki articles so even products under technical guidance is having documentation removed. Example: with 8.7.11 https://wiki.zimbra.com/index.php?title=Block_user_to_send_email_locally_or_externally&oldid=66653 Lasted update witho...

Without seeing these 2 headers... From and Return-Path, this is a guess. Also you don't say if the encrypted pdf was still virus scanned or didn't show up nor if you restarted amavis. I do see one obvious problem when desk checking your rules. You are scoring -7 points to your trusted sender (provid...

https://forums.zimbra.org/viewtopic.php?f=15&t=64117#p295675 Create a meta rule with SA and negatively score a hit on that rule when it also matches your users and encrypted pdf hit. It seams to me like your solution allows all encrypted PDF's. Is there a way to completely bypass the filters fo...

viewtopic.php?f=15&t=64117#p295675

Create a meta rule with SA and negatively score a hit on that rule when it also matches your users and encrypted pdf hit.

HTH,

Jim

What I am seeing is the email subject and body are base64 encoded. It seems that no checking is being performed on them as they fly straight through two different anti-spam systems I have in play. Interesting, base64 sounds to be a reasonable spam hit as it would be obfuscating the subject line IMO...

Thanks Randy. These call summaries are very much appreciated.

PS. That is fantastic news with regard to Synacor giving Barry the Channel Evangelist role. I look forward to seeing some of his how-to articles.