Crap!
-
- Posts: 2
- Joined: Sat Sep 13, 2014 3:55 am
Crap!
I tried the community open source version. Installed CentOS 6.5 and installed the open source version. Installation was finished. Entered the password. The webserver for configuring Zimbra did not respond. Reboot and all services failed. ...
Really great stuff!
Ok. . Second option. Install the OVF. OVF installed in VMWare. Configuration page now works, but you need a trial key. I requested the trial key. And off course it is being send as an .xml file that is obviously blocked by Exchange. NOT very usefull to not think about that guys if you want to have people switch from Exchange to Zimbra!!! But oke. Second time i registrered to gmail. Got the xml. Entered it and........ offcourse an error message and the installation cannot continue.
I gave it a try, but this software is Crap.
Crap!
[quote user="Edwin Brokx"]I tried the community open source version. Installed CentOS 6.5 and installed the open source version. Installation was finished. Entered the password. The webserver for configuring Zimbra did not respond. Reboot and all services failed. ...
Really great stuff! [/quote]Then you have some configuration issues, installing ZCS on CentOS (or RHEL) is one of the easiest installs if you done the required steps.
[quote user="Edwin Brokx"]Ok. . Second option. Install the OVF. OVF installed in VMWare.[/quote]That's not even a supported product any longer and as far as I know there's no download for it or did you actually get it from the Zimbra site?
I notice that you haven't given any actual details about the problem you've encountered nor have you asked for any help in these forums, did you register just to rant or to get some help?
Really great stuff! [/quote]Then you have some configuration issues, installing ZCS on CentOS (or RHEL) is one of the easiest installs if you done the required steps.
[quote user="Edwin Brokx"]Ok. . Second option. Install the OVF. OVF installed in VMWare.[/quote]That's not even a supported product any longer and as far as I know there's no download for it or did you actually get it from the Zimbra site?
I notice that you haven't given any actual details about the problem you've encountered nor have you asked for any help in these forums, did you register just to rant or to get some help?
-
- Posts: 2
- Joined: Sat Sep 13, 2014 3:55 am
Crap!
I am going to install it again. The OVF version i mean. There is not a whole lot that you can misconfigure in a template file offcourse.. I will let you know
Crap!
[quote user="Edwin Brokx"]I am going to install it again. The OVF version i mean. There is not a whole lot that you can misconfigure in a template file offcourse.. I will let you know[/QUOTE]As I've mentioned, that is not a supported version - you're far better installing on CentOS instead.
- pup_seba
- Outstanding Member
- Posts: 687
- Joined: Sat Sep 13, 2014 2:43 am
- Location: Tarragona - Spain
- Contact:
Crap!
Yeah...also "spaghettis are crap". I tried to cook them in the oven you know...with milk instead of water and then after 1.30 hour at 220º no tomatoe sauce magically appear on top of them. As I said...spaguettis are crap too!!!
Sebas
Sebas
Crap!
[quote user="umarzuki"]services not starting usually caused by not enough resources especially RAM. 2GB at least.[/QUOTE]RAM requirements are now higher than that.
-
- Advanced member
- Posts: 75
- Joined: Sat Sep 13, 2014 2:29 am
Crap!
Typical java code monkeys are known not to care about resources.
If that situation continues, and the JVM process alone eating up several GB of RAM,
it's understandable that they're only supporting 64bit distros.
By the way: as long as individual process image sizes stay below 4GB, a 32bit userland
would be fine, and in most cases way more memory efficient ... but that's one of the
things java monkey will never understand, as they tend to be totally ignorant towards
hardware and system programming ;-o
If that situation continues, and the JVM process alone eating up several GB of RAM,
it's understandable that they're only supporting 64bit distros.
By the way: as long as individual process image sizes stay below 4GB, a 32bit userland
would be fine, and in most cases way more memory efficient ... but that's one of the
things java monkey will never understand, as they tend to be totally ignorant towards
hardware and system programming ;-o