Search found 146 matches
- Fri May 08, 2015 4:06 pm
- Forum: Announcements
- Topic: Zimbra Collaboration 8.6 Patch 1 is here
- Replies: 12
- Views: 7685
Zimbra Collaboration 8.6 Patch 1 is here
awkward. ridiculous.
- Fri May 08, 2015 3:00 pm
- Forum: Announcements
- Topic: Zimbra Collaboration 8.6 Patch 2 is here
- Replies: 19
- Views: 10177
Zimbra Collaboration 8.6 Patch 2 is here
Totally ridiculous ! _YET AGAIN_ completely you're breaking package database consistency. IDS'es will go to red alert. You seriously expect decent GNU/Linux operators to run strange "upgrader" scripts *manually*, instead of just running an simple apt/yum upgrade (or let it run automaticall...
- Wed May 06, 2015 4:30 pm
- Forum: Developers
- Topic: Git repo is unavailable
- Replies: 33
- Views: 10484
Git repo is unavailable
Looks like this P4->git mirror is really a big mess.
@zimbra: why dont you just use git directly ?
Just move the NE stuff to a separate repo, so you dont need that absurd "views" stuff.
@zimbra: why dont you just use git directly ?
Just move the NE stuff to a separate repo, so you dont need that absurd "views" stuff.
- Wed May 06, 2015 4:28 pm
- Forum: Announcements
- Topic: Zimbra Collaboration 8.6 Patch 1 is here
- Replies: 12
- Views: 7685
Zimbra Collaboration 8.6 Patch 1 is here
hmm, looks like it replaced the wrong files ...
such things happen, if one doesnt use a proper package management.
(well, I'm telling this for many years now ... ;-o)
by the way: did you run into any restrictions (eg. cant create any new users due to lack of license activations) ?
such things happen, if one doesnt use a proper package management.
(well, I'm telling this for many years now ... ;-o)
by the way: did you run into any restrictions (eg. cant create any new users due to lack of license activations) ?
- Sat Mar 14, 2015 5:38 am
- Forum: Announcements
- Topic: Zimbra Collaboration 8.6 Patch 1 is here
- Replies: 12
- Views: 7685
Zimbra Collaboration 8.6 Patch 1 is here
Unbelievable - you're *STILL* supplying a _program_ to replace _individual_ files, thus *breaking* package management consistency!
Why dont you just supply updated packages (.deb/.rpm) ?!
Looks you really wanna make operating unnecessarily complicated.
Really silly and unprofessional !
Why dont you just supply updated packages (.deb/.rpm) ?!
Looks you really wanna make operating unnecessarily complicated.
Really silly and unprofessional !
- Sat Feb 21, 2015 6:56 am
- Forum: Administrators
- Topic: Ubuntu Upgrade, Perl Version Broke ZImbra
- Replies: 7
- Views: 3928
Ubuntu Upgrade, Perl Version Broke ZImbra
Such things happen if comlex software isn't properly packaged for the target distro ...
- Sat Feb 07, 2015 9:04 am
- Forum: Administrators
- Topic: Please Vote for the Cisco-Mittel UC re-instatement Bug 93620!
- Replies: 5
- Views: 2210
Please Vote for the Cisco-Mittel UC re-instatement Bug 93620!
Because security actually matters to me.
- Sat Feb 07, 2015 8:55 am
- Forum: Administrators
- Topic: glibc Ghost vulnerability
- Replies: 17
- Views: 5268
glibc Ghost vulnerability
Exactly. The rationale behind this is that users/operators might actively use certain packages which had been pulled in implicitly via dependencies and could be removed by deps changing on some upgrade. That could lead to some unexpected behaviour (from users/operators PoV - even though logically th...
- Sat Feb 07, 2015 8:11 am
- Forum: Administrators
- Topic: blocking extension on mail attachement
- Replies: 4
- Views: 1826
- Wed Feb 04, 2015 5:20 pm
- Forum: Administrators
- Topic: glibc Ghost vulnerability
- Replies: 17
- Views: 5268
glibc Ghost vulnerability
Originally, dist-upgrade was meant to run a dist release upgrade - *AFTER* sources.list was adapted to the new repo/release name. But some packages aren't upgradable that easily, but need some more magic (well, some upstreams are just dumb :p), that's what do-release-upgrade (and associated per-dist...