Search found 971 matches
- Thu May 22, 2025 2:59 pm
- Forum: Administrators
- Topic: /opt/zimbra/bin/zmacl and crowdstrike detections
- Replies: 3
- Views: 582
Re: /opt/zimbra/bin/zmacl and crowdstrike detections
I am on the other side of this... this blows away these type of tripwire reports and will neuter some benefits from these type of tools. disable/enable ACL's is a deterministic window that can be exploited so why have them there in the first place? Enable those ACL's and leave them that way. There a...
- Fri May 16, 2025 5:09 pm
- Forum: Installation and Upgrade
- Topic: New patch - 10.1.8, 10.0.14 and 9.0.0 P45
- Replies: 22
- Views: 3460
Re: New patch - 10.1.8, 10.0.14 and 9.0.0 P45
Built 10.0.14 tarball and updated 10.0.13 without issue on 2 hosts. Simple these days to maintain FOSS. # su - zimbra % zmcontrol -v Release 10.0.14_GA_1011040.RHEL8_64_20250516072230 RHEL8_64 FOSS edition. List of known FOSS projects offering binaries or scripts: https://wiki.zimbra.com/wiki/Zimbra...
- Tue May 13, 2025 7:51 pm
- Forum: Administrators
- Topic: Chrome 137 vs Zimbra
- Replies: 13
- Views: 3249
Re: Chrome 137 vs Zimbra
Revert XMLSerializerConsistentDefaultNsDeclMatching to "test" status They marked this bug report fixed as a result. Back to testing status for this patch. FWIW, I presented an idea for a compatibility fix but didn't test it. Zimbra should proactively get in front of this if they are able ...
- Tue May 13, 2025 3:37 pm
- Forum: Administrators
- Topic: Chrome 137 vs Zimbra
- Replies: 13
- Views: 3249
Re: Chrome 137 vs Zimbra
Thanks @ghen and everyone that reported on this. I had also posted and gave them the link to your forum post and updated again this morning after looking at the code link you provided. I thought they wanted to be stricter in 137 and required both local name "xmlns" AND namespace URI to be ...
- Mon May 05, 2025 4:11 pm
- Forum: Installation and Upgrade
- Topic: Any alternatives to Zimbra?
- Replies: 6
- Views: 3099
Re: Any alternatives to Zimbra?
Getting ready to bring up Stalwart in parallel with Zimbra here and test various https://jmap.io/software.html JMAP clients. Tracking parula as potential interface (MUA) and mailemi (mobile) but too early to know at this point. Zimbra's classic interface is what our users know so that determines a l...
- Thu Apr 10, 2025 3:57 pm
- Forum: Installation and Upgrade
- Topic: zmacl missing in 10.1.6 build?
- Replies: 11
- Views: 5076
Re: zmacl missing in 10.1.6 build?
The tool uses Ian's tool for that... that is what the init does the very first time when you set it up. Based on your OS, he installs the correct toolchains and libraries. % ./build_zimbra.sh --init The bash script above only works with supported OS. In theory, a RHEL8 binary should work. Adrian's t...
- Thu Apr 10, 2025 3:34 pm
- Forum: Installation and Upgrade
- Topic: zmacl missing in 10.1.6 build?
- Replies: 11
- Views: 5076
Re: zmacl missing in 10.1.6 build?
Yea we basically have to loop through all the repositories to find the highest tag of that version to use on that option you mention. Their build.pl script is smart enough to clone the highest from each of those repositories before it compiles and build them. Because they don't update the documentat...
- Thu Apr 10, 2025 3:06 pm
- Forum: Installation and Upgrade
- Topic: zmacl missing in 10.1.6 build?
- Replies: 11
- Views: 5076
Re: zmacl missing in 10.1.6 build?
I had the same problem with RHEL8. I guess it's possible I'm missing a package of some sort, but I'd expect an error to that effect. What is zmacl and where does it come from? I'm assuming it's zimbra specific code that's compiled, is that correct? % cd zm-core-utils/ % git tag 10.1.6 % ls src/bin/...
- Thu Apr 10, 2025 2:22 pm
- Forum: Installation and Upgrade
- Topic: zmacl missing in 10.1.6 build?
- Replies: 11
- Views: 5076
Re: zmacl missing in 10.1.6 build?
but it looks like 10.1.6 if failing when it tries to copy the zmacl binary to the packaging directory. I'm building from the source at https://github.com/Zimbra/zm-build. No issues here on RHEL8. Just built 10.1.6. This was the command line I used. % ./build_zimbra.sh --dry-run --quiet --version 10...
- Mon Mar 31, 2025 3:56 pm
- Forum: Migration
- Topic: Error during Migration Centos 6 to Rocky 8 Zimbra v9.0.0
- Replies: 8
- Views: 17101
Re: Error during Migration Centos 6 to Rocky 8 Zimbra v9.0.0
Good news you found a solution. I had also thought about this method below which looks at the packages already installed with the first install.sh -s to do just enough to get that second install.sh -s to run again. % cat findPackageByPath.sh for pkg in $(rpm -qa | grep perl); do if rpm -ql "$pk...