Zimbra Forums

This raises the question whether the critical security issue fixed in 10.1.18 has been introduced in 10.1.17 ?

(as it seems the license issue fixed in 10.1.18 has also been introduced in 10.1.17: https://github.com/Zimbra/zm-mailbox/pull/1829)

Can we discuss upcoming 10.1.18 in a separate thread ?

PS: if already on 10.1.17 you can in fact apply the 10.1.18 patch with more confidence (less changes wrt your current version).

It's called a spam bot.

Reported to the moderators.

Push support for ZBUG-5554.

I rebuilt zimbra-nginx with the relevant patches and we're running this in production now.
I sent this to Zimbra support and they assigned it ZBUG-5554.

Hi Does anyone here have zimbraSSDBResourcePoolSize and/or zimbraSSDBResourcePoolTimeout set to non-zero values? We are experiencing occasional connection leaks from Zimbra towards the ephemeral database (SSDB/Redis), where sometimes new connections get created in bursts, which are never closed agai...

I went ahead and deleted the "wiki" user. It's not used anywhere anymore.

I can reproduce rainer's problem (unable to migrate the mailbox), but without the logging issue; the address is properly logged here, including the + sign: com.zimbra.common.service.ServiceException: system failure: Account a+b+c@example.com does not have a mailbox on server server1.example.com I wa...

Can you rename it and add the problematic address back as an alias? (with "zmprov ra" and "zmprov aaa")

It was created at initial installation by /opt/zimbra/libexec/zmsetup.pl, it seems to be related to the deprecated "notebook" feature (deprecated since Zimbra 7.0). We still have it too, and it was migrated along with all our other accounts by zmmboxmove last year, so it shouldn't be an ex...