Zimbra Forums

did you check that the parameters did correctly propagate to the new server, too? Yes, the parameters are correctly propagated. I've even set the zimbraImapMaxRequestSize from the default 10kb to 100mb just for trying I receive the error "maximum size exceeded" in response to the login co...

DualBoot wrote: did you whitelisted your new Ip proxy ?

Yes, both in zimbraHttpThrottleSafeIPs and in zimbraMailTrustedIP. Set up in global config and inherited by both servers.

We are in the middle of a rolling upgrade migration from ZCS 8.0.8 to ZCS 8.8.12 and experiencing some weird behaviour related to the IMAP proxy. At this point some users have been moved to the new 8.8.12 server and some are on the old 8.0.6. All users access now from the proxy service on the new 8....

Apparently was caused by the shared folder sorting order. By default the sorting order of that folder was descending by date. In some cases, I pressed the blue dot to visualize only the unread messages. Pressing again the blue dot SEEMS to bring back to the previous state of descending by date, but ...

Does your server reach the internet or is it isolated?
Try skipping the activation, you can do it later, once you've installed

./install.sh --skipactivation check

It's the farthest thing from the "community" and the "open" philosophy , but in this case could be of help...

It's clear that this forum is being monitored by exploiters and used to modify the attack vector accordingly. One of the steps of the attack is to modify the date of the files /opt/zimbra/mailboxd/webapps/zimbra/js/zimbra/csfe/XZimbra.jsp /opt/zimbra/mailboxd/webapps/zimbra/public/Ajax.jsp /opt/zimb...

This is just my personal opinion, but, it just seems that zimbra is taking all the wrong decisions you can take, unless of course you are just trying to kill the product. - Almost no participation in its comunity - Not providing a bug report system - Outdated and incomplete documentation - Outdated...

#> su - zimbra
#> mysql

Looks like this
viewtopic.php?t=25526