Maldua's Zimbra FOSS Builds - Share your feedback

Ask questions about your setup or get help installing ZCS server (ZD section below).
phoenix
Ambassador
Ambassador
Posts: 27286
Joined: Fri Sep 12, 2014 9:56 pm
Location: Liverpool, England

Re: Maldua's Zimbra FOSS Builds - Share your feedback

Post by phoenix »

halfgaar wrote: Sun Jul 28, 2024 3:04 pm
DNS ERROR resolving MX for meel.halfgaar.net
It is suggested that the domain name have an MX record configured in DNS
Change domain name? [Yes] no
done.
Checking for port conflicts
Port conflict detected: 53 (zimbra-dnscache)
Port conflicts detected! - Press Enter/Return key to continue
Checking ldap status....not running.
Starting ldap...done.
Setting defaults from ldap...done.

Main menu

1) Common Configuration:
+Hostname: meel.halfgaar.net
+Ldap master host: meel.halfgaar.net
+Ldap port: 389
******* +Ldap Admin password: Not Verified
+Store ephemeral attributes outside Ldap: yes
+Value for zimbraEphemeralBackendURL: ldap://default
+Secure interprocess communications: yes
+TimeZone: Europe/Berlin
+IP Mode: ipv4
+Default SSL digest: sha256

2) zimbra-ldap: Enabled
+Create Domain: yes
+Domain to create: halfgaar.net
+Ldap root password: set
+Ldap replication password: set
******* +Ldap postfix password: Not Verified
******* +Ldap amavis password: Not Verified
******* +Ldap nginx password: Not Verified
******* +Ldap Bes Searcher password: Not Verified
[/code]

That MX error seems unrelated, nor do I want an MX record on that subdomain.
That is not a subdomain, it's the FQDN for your mail server and an MX record is required. ;) You should read the Zimbra wiki for details of DNS requirements or:

Code: Select all

https://kb.iu.edu/d/aiuv 
Regards

Bill

Rspamd: A high performance spamassassin replacement

Per ardua ad astra
halfgaar
Outstanding Member
Outstanding Member
Posts: 202
Joined: Sat Sep 13, 2014 12:54 am
Location: Netherlands
ZCS/ZD Version: Ubuntu 18.04, 8.8.15_P43
Contact:

Re: Maldua's Zimbra FOSS Builds - Share your feedback

Post by halfgaar »

I don't see why the FQDN of the server needs to have an MX record. It's not relevant for how the server HELOs itself, or how it's addressable. My FQDN, meel.halfgaar.net, goes into the MX record of domains that I want to use the server for, or domains used in SMTP 'mail from' and 'header from', but the FQDN itself does not need an MX record.

I operate many mail servers, various configurations of Postfix mostly, and I never have that MX record.

Case in point: the MX record of gmail.com points to many SMTP servers, non of which have an MX record.
Consider seriously: because of the history of exploits: block Zimbra web interface with VPN, firewall or HTTP proxy.
phoenix
Ambassador
Ambassador
Posts: 27286
Joined: Fri Sep 12, 2014 9:56 pm
Location: Liverpool, England

Re: Maldua's Zimbra FOSS Builds - Share your feedback

Post by phoenix »

I'd suggest you read RFC 1035 which states that the MX record points to an FQDN, this has been shown in the Zimbra wiki article that covers this topic of DNS requirements for your ZCS server. Further information can be found in this search: https://www.startpage.com/do/dsearch?qu ... sion=1.1.7
Regards

Bill

Rspamd: A high performance spamassassin replacement

Per ardua ad astra
User avatar
adrian.gibanel.btactic
Outstanding Member
Outstanding Member
Posts: 200
Joined: Thu Jan 30, 2014 11:13 am

Re: Maldua's Zimbra FOSS Builds - Share your feedback

Post by adrian.gibanel.btactic »

halfgaar wrote: Sun Jul 28, 2024 3:04 pm For the next test step, I tried upgrading my Ubuntu and go from 'zcs-10.1.0_GA_4200000.UBUNTU18_64.20240719155652' to 'zcs-10.1.0_GA_4200000.UBUNTU20_64.20240719155625'. I tried the normal 'install.sh', but also the 'install.sh --software-only' method as described on the wiki, which involves placing back your local config and running '/opt/zimbra/libexec/zmsetup.pl'. Both had the same result, of ldap issues.
Do not use that awful documentation. Use this one instead.

Make sure to replace:
  • 8.8.15 to 10.1.0
  • 18.04 to 20.04
  • 16.04 to 18.04
and you are good to go.
Last edited by adrian.gibanel.btactic on Tue Jul 30, 2024 1:20 pm, edited 1 time in total.
liverpoolfcfan
Elite member
Elite member
Posts: 1138
Joined: Sat Sep 13, 2014 12:47 am

Re: Maldua's Zimbra FOSS Builds - Share your feedback

Post by liverpoolfcfan »

halfgaar wrote: Sun Jul 28, 2024 8:10 pm I don't see why the FQDN of the server needs to have an MX record. It's not relevant for how the server HELOs itself, or how it's addressable. My FQDN, meel.halfgaar.net, goes into the MX record of domains that I want to use the server for, or domains used in SMTP 'mail from' and 'header from', but the FQDN itself does not need an MX record.

I operate many mail servers, various configurations of Postfix mostly, and I never have that MX record.

Case in point: the MX record of gmail.com points to many SMTP servers, non of which have an MX record.
The setup is merely pointing out that it cannot find an mx record in DNS for mx.meel.halfgaar.net as it is about to create a domain meel.halfgaar.net in your zimbra server.

It is offering you the opportunity to change the domain name it is about to create. You might for example want to create the email domain halfgaar.net (which has a DNS record - mx.halfgaar.net) running on server meel.halfgaar.net
halfgaar
Outstanding Member
Outstanding Member
Posts: 202
Joined: Sat Sep 13, 2014 12:54 am
Location: Netherlands
ZCS/ZD Version: Ubuntu 18.04, 8.8.15_P43
Contact:

Re: Maldua's Zimbra FOSS Builds - Share your feedback

Post by halfgaar »

liverpoolfcfan wrote: Mon Jul 29, 2024 1:10 pm The setup is merely pointing out that it cannot find an mx record in DNS for mx.meel.halfgaar.net as it is about to create a domain meel.halfgaar.net in your zimbra server.

It is offering you the opportunity to change the domain name it is about to create. You might for example want to create the email domain halfgaar.net (which has a DNS record - mx.halfgaar.net) running on server meel.halfgaar.net
This Zimbra mail server has been running for some 10-15 years like this. It's indeed the server named meel.halfgaar.net, serving mail for, among others, halfgaar.net.

It may be related to it being a copy of the original VM. I changed /etc/hosts to make it think meel.halfgaar.net is the new IP. This works for the Ubuntu 18 Zimbra 10.1.0 install, but when I try to install the Ubuntu 20 version after doing do-release-upgrade, it complains about this MX record.

It shouldn't be too much of an issue, as long as it's unrelated to my ldap failures. Probably it's best ignored in this thread, no matter if my setup is wrong or right,, unless it's related to Maldua's builds. I first need to try the different upgrade method he linked to.
Consider seriously: because of the history of exploits: block Zimbra web interface with VPN, firewall or HTTP proxy.
halfgaar
Outstanding Member
Outstanding Member
Posts: 202
Joined: Sat Sep 13, 2014 12:54 am
Location: Netherlands
ZCS/ZD Version: Ubuntu 18.04, 8.8.15_P43
Contact:

Re: Maldua's Zimbra FOSS Builds - Share your feedback

Post by halfgaar »

adrian.gibanel.btactic wrote: Mon Jul 29, 2024 8:58 am
halfgaar wrote: Sun Jul 28, 2024 3:04 pm For the next test step, I tried upgrading my Ubuntu and go from 'zcs-10.1.0_GA_4200000.UBUNTU18_64.20240719155652' to 'zcs-10.1.0_GA_4200000.UBUNTU20_64.20240719155625'. I tried the normal 'install.sh', but also the 'install.sh --software-only' method as described on the wiki, which involves placing back your local config and running '/opt/zimbra/libexec/zmsetup.pl'. Both had the same result, of ldap issues.
Do not use that awful documentation. Use this one instead.

Make sure to replace:
  • 8.8.15 to 10.1.0
  • 18.04 to 20.04
  • 16.04 to 18.04
and you are good to go.
To confirm, that worked. The key was putting the following in /etc/update-manager/release-upgrades.d/allow-thirdparty.cfg:

Code: Select all

[Sources]
AllowThirdParty=yes
That prevents Zimbra packages being removed by 'do-release-upgrade'.
Consider seriously: because of the history of exploits: block Zimbra web interface with VPN, firewall or HTTP proxy.
User avatar
adrian.gibanel.btactic
Outstanding Member
Outstanding Member
Posts: 200
Joined: Thu Jan 30, 2014 11:13 am

Re: Maldua's Zimbra FOSS Builds - Share your feedback

Post by adrian.gibanel.btactic »

Apparently 10.1.0 FOSS builds have a bug that doesn't enable you to manage storages (new way of saying volumes) because it asks you for a license.

You can find more information at:
User avatar
adrian.gibanel.btactic
Outstanding Member
Outstanding Member
Posts: 200
Joined: Thu Jan 30, 2014 11:13 am

Maldua's Zimbra 10.0.9 FOSS Builds - Share your feedback

Post by adrian.gibanel.btactic »

Hello,

Maldua's Zimbra 10.0.9 FOSS Builds have just been released.

Please share your experience when upgrading or installing from scratch.

Versions:
  • 10.0.9
Platforms:
  • RHEL7 (Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7, Oracle Linux 7, CentOS 7)
  • RHEL8 (Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8, Oracle Linux 8, CentOS 8, Rocky Linux 8)
  • Ubuntu 18.04
  • Ubuntu 20.04

Thank you very much!

Notes:
  • These are recent releases. They will become stable releases when after 15 days of being public there has not been any major negative feedback.
  • This is not an official Zimbra/Synacor build.
halfgaar
Outstanding Member
Outstanding Member
Posts: 202
Joined: Sat Sep 13, 2014 12:54 am
Location: Netherlands
ZCS/ZD Version: Ubuntu 18.04, 8.8.15_P43
Contact:

Re: Maldua's Zimbra FOSS Builds - Share your feedback

Post by halfgaar »

Is there a reason to use 10.0.9 vs 10.1.0?
Consider seriously: because of the history of exploits: block Zimbra web interface with VPN, firewall or HTTP proxy.
Post Reply